H. (M.S.) v. H. (L.) (Child Abduction: Custody) [2000] 3 IR 390; [2001] 1 ILRM 448
Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the removal was wrongful as it was in breach of the father’s custody rights. The standard of harm required under Article 13(1)(b) had not been made out.
R.K. v. J.K. (Child Abduction: Acquiescence) [2000] 2 IR 416
Appeal dismissed; the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) to show that the father had acquiesced had not been met.
Prizzia v. Hungary (Application No 20255/12)
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-120951
Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Stuttgart Higher Regional Court), 17 UF 56/16, 04 May 2016
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 2 BvR 233/96, 15 February 1996
OL v. PQ (C-111/17 PPU)
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62017CJ0111
OLG Karlsruhe 2 UF 200 9 – 3 February 2020
Order issued by Thuringia Higher Regional Court ? 2 UF 485/19
OLG München (Munich Higher Regional Court), 6 July 2016, 12 UF 532/16
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 1 BvR 1465/05, 18 July 2006
A l’unanimit?: Annulation pour inconstitutionnalit? (violation des art. 6(2), 2(1) et 103(1) de la Loi fondamentale allemande (Grundgesetz)) des d?cisions de premi?re instance et d’appel ordonnant le retour de l’enfant. Un curateur de proc?dure aurait d? ?tre nomm? pour l’enfant. Renvoi ? la Cour d’appel de Coblence afin qu’elle statue, apr?s d?signation d’un curateur de […]