Cour d’appel de Luxembourg, 8 mai 2013, No de r?le 39629
Appel rejet? et retour refus? ; le d?placement de l’enfant ?tait illicite mais les conditions requises pour appliquer l’article 13(1)(b) ?taient r?unies.
Tribunal d’arrondissement de Diekirch, 18 juin 2013, R?f?r? No 144/2013
https://www.incadat.com/en/case/1323
2015 (Ra) No. 714 Appeal case against an order to return the child
2016 (Ra) No. 445 Appeal case against dismissal of case seeking return of a child
Family, appeal request 1930/14, Plonit v Ploni
http://elyon1.court.gov.il/files/14/300/019/z06/14019300.z06.pdf
Family Application 8743/07 Y.D.G. v T.G.
Family Application 042721/06 G.K. v Y.K.
Family Application 2059/07 Ploni vs. Almonit
DZ v YVAMVD, RFamA 2270/13
http://elyon1.court.gov.il/files/13/700/022/t04/13022700.t04.pdf
LM v MM Nevo, RFamA 2338/09
Appeal dismissed and return order upheld; the retention was wrongful the child being habitually resident in France at the relevant date, and none of the exceptions had been established to the standard required under the Hague Convention.