Gonzalez v. Gutierrez, 311 F.3d 942 (9th Cir 2002)
Appeal allowed and application dismissed; a right of veto over the removal of a child from the jurisdiction did not afford a non-custodial parent a “right of custody” for the purposes of the Convention.
Lops v. Lops, 140 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 1998)
Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the children were not settled in the United States and the District Court had not abused its discretion in exercising jurisdiction in the case.
Robinson v. Robinson, 983 F. Supp. 1339 (D. Colo. 1997)
Return refused; the removal was wrongful, but, the children were now settled in their new environment in accordance with Article 12(2).
Currier v. Currier, 845 F. Supp. 916 (D.N.H. 1994)
Return ordered; the standard required under Articles 13(1)(a) and 13(1)(b) had not been met.
Brooke v. Willis, 907 F. Supp. 57 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)
Writ of habeas corpus issued ordering the mother to produce the child in court within fourteen days and show cause why the child was removed.
KR v HH [2020] EWHC 834 (Fam)
Re W. (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 520, [2010] 2 F.L.R. 1165
K. v. K., Re M.-N.K. and A.K. (Minors), 3 December 1996, transcript, High Court of Northern Ireland
http://www.hcch.net/incadat/fullcase/0241.htm
X v Y and Z Police Force [2012] EWHC 2838 (Fam)
http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed104956
VK and AK v CC [2014] NICA 15
http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NICA/2014/15.html