
R? 1996 ref 52, A.F.J. v. T.J., 9 May 1996, Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
The child, a girl, was 7 2/3 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The parents were divorced. A shuttle custody arrangement was established

The child, a girl, was 7 2/3 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The parents were divorced. A shuttle custody arrangement was established

The children, both girls, were 6 and 1 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. On 18 January 1996 the High Court made a

The children, a girl and a boy, were aged 8 and 2 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had lived in

The children of the family involved in the application, both girls, were aged 7 and almost 5, at the date of the alleged wrongful retention.

L’enfant, une fille, ?tait ?g?e d’un an ? la date du d?placement dont le caract?re illicite ?tait all?gu?. La famille vivait dans le Michigan. Le

The child, a boy, was 2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had spent all of his life in Germany. The parents

The child, a girl, was 13 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Ireland all of her life. The

The children were aged 2 and 3 months at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were married and the family lived in

The hearing related to three children who were aged 11, 7, and 4. They had lived all of their lives in Tenerife before being taken

The children of the family involved in the application, both girls, were aged 7 and almost 5, at the date of the alleged wrongful retention.