
Re F. (A Child) [2009] EWCA Civ 416
The child, a boy, was aged eight at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He was born in Poland to Polish parents and had

The child, a boy, was aged eight at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He was born in Poland to Polish parents and had

The application related to a child born in 2004 to a British father and a South African mother. The parents had married in South Africa.

R?sidence habituelle – art. 3 La m?re indiquait que la Cour d’appel n’avait pas caract?ris? que la r?sidence habituelle de l’enfant, qui avait souvent effectu?

The application related to a child born in Germany on 11 January 2005. Shortly after the birth the parents separated with the child remaining with

Aims of the Convention – Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 The father did not seek to challenge the legal basis for the non-return order but

The child, a boy, was born in Ontario in June 2006. The Australian father did not secure entry to the country because of a criminal

The child, a girl, was almost 1 year old at the time of the alleged wrongful removal. She was born in France in July 2007,

The proceedings, which were in the context of immigration and asylum law rather than child abduction law, related to a Lebanese mother and child, the

Les deux enfants, n?s en 1989 et 1990, avaient v?cu jusqu’en 1996 en Argentine. Depuis le divorce de leurs parents, ils vivaient avec la m?re

Habitual Residence – Art. 3 The parents presented contrasting cases as to the nature of the move to Scotland. For the mother it was a