
M. v. M., 18 August 2000, Jerusalem Family Court
Article 15 declaration refused; the removal was not wrongful as no rights of custody had been breached.

Article 15 declaration refused; the removal was not wrongful as no rights of custody had been breached.

http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/07/07-50967-CV0.wpd.pdf

Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the standard required under Articles 13(1)(b) and 12(2) had not been met.

Return refused; the foster parents did not enjoy any rights of custody at the moment of the removal.

http://www.hcch.net/incadat/fullcase/0239.htm

http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/71f93df7-ea3b-4c38-9c7c-8e1ee722f563/5/doc/06-5614-cv_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/71f93df7-ea3b-4c38-9c7c-8e1ee722f563/5/hilite/

Constitutional claims dismissed, claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act dismissed, claim of a conspiracy based on racial or other class-based animus dismissed and writ

Application to appeal dismissed and return order upheld. The prior return of the child rendered an appeal moot.

Return ordered; the removal was wrongful, the children being habitually resident in Germany at the time they were taken.

Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the children were habitually resident in Germany at the time of the removal, albeit the primary reasoning of the trial