Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart, 17 UF 260/98, 25 November 1998
Appeal dismissed and return refused; while the retention of the children in Germany was wrongful, the standard of harm required under Article 13(1)(b) had been met.
Cass Civ 1?re, 26 octobre 2011, Nº de pourvoi 10-19.905, 1015
http://www.courdecassation.fr/jurisprudence_2/premiere_chambre_civile_568/1015_26_21336.html
CA Poitiers, 6 mai 2009, No de RG 09/00305
CA N?mes, 18 f?vrier 2009, No de RG 08/04984
CA Toulouse, 2 d?cembre 2008, No RG 00/03897
Recours rejet?. Le non-retour ?tait illicite mais le p?re y avait acquiesc?.
CA Paris, 27 octobre 2005, No de RG 05/15032
Appeal allowed and return refused; the child was now settled in her new environment pursuant to the terms of Article 12(2).
Cass Civ 1?re 16 juillet 1993, N? de pourvoi 92-19618
Challenge to legality dismissed; the mother’s removal was wrongful but she had subsequently been awarded custody.
14-Dec
B.L.W. v. B.W.L. [2007] 2 HKLRD 193
https://www.incadat.com/en/case/879
Callicut v. Callicut, 2014 MBQB 144
https://www.incadat.com/en/case/1115