Family Application 8743/07 Y.D.G. v T.G.
Family Application 042721/06 G.K. v Y.K.
Family Application 2059/07 Ploni vs. Almonit
3052/99 S. v. S.
Appeal allowed and return refused; decision of the trial court, that the standard required by Article 13(2) had not been met, restored.
W.P.P. v. S.R.W. [2001] ILRM 371
Application dismissed; the removal was not wrongful as it was not in breach of any rights of custody.
Prizzia v. Hungary (Application No 20255/12)
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-120951
Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Stuttgart Higher Regional Court), 17 UF 56/16, 04 May 2016
OLG Karlsruhe 2 UF 200 9 – 3 February 2020
Bundesgerichtshof, XII. Zivilsenat, XII ZB 79/04, 7 April 2004
Recours irrecevable. La d?cision de la Cour d’appel ?tait une d?cision interm?diaire au sens de l’article 6 alin?a 2 de la loi mettant en oeuvre la Convention en Allemagne (SorgeR??bkAG) et ne pouvait d?s lors faire l’objet d’un recours ind?pendant. A noter qu’au regard de toute autre d?cision rendue en mati?re d’enl?vement d’enfant, c’est la […]
Oberlandesgericht Bamberg, 2 UF 224/98, 29 October 1998
Appeal dismissed, and application dismissed; the retention was not wrongful as there was no breach of custody rights.