5A_764/2009 & 5A_778/2009, II. zivilrechtliche Abteilung, arr?t du TF du 11 janvier 2010
http://relevancy.bger.ch/php/aza/http/index.php?lang=fr&type=highlight_simple_query&page=1&from_date=&to_date=&sort=relevance&insertion_date=&top_subcollection_aza=all&query_words=5A_764%2F2009+%26+5A_778%2F2009%2C+II.+zivilrechtliche+Abteilung%2C+arr%EAt+
5P.1999/2006 /blb, Bundesgericht, II. Zivilabteilung (Tribunal F?d?ral, 2?me Chambre Civile)
Recours rejet?, confirmation du rejet de la demande de retour. C’?tait ? bon droit que la cour d’appel avait conclu ? l’application de l’article 13 alin?a 1 a.
W.P. c. W.M., IIe cour civile du 20.6.1994, ATF 120 Ia 165
Recours irrecevable; le p?re n’avait pas d’int?r?t actuel et pratique ? l’annulation de la d?cision attaqu?e du fait de l’ex?cution de l’ordonnance de retour qu’elle confirmait.
Justice de paix du cercle de Lausanne (magistrates’ court Lausanne), decision of 17 December 1998, J 765 CIEV 112E
Return ordered; the removal was wrongful and none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.
R? 1995 ref 99, Regeringsr??tten (Supreme Administrative Court), decision of 20 December 1995, case number 4936-1995
Appeal allowed and return refused; the removal was not wrongful since the child was habitually resident in Sweden on the relevant date.
Pennello v. Pennello [2003] 1 All SA 716 (N)
Appeal allowed and return refused; Article 13(1)(b) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.
Clarke v. Carson [1996] 1 NZFLR 349
https://www.incadat.com/en/case/947
M v. M [2012] NZFLR 429
http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2012/874.html
Gross v. Boda [1995] NZFLR 49
Appeal allowed on the basis that there had been a breach of custody rights and case remitted to the District Court for the making of a return order and any appropriate incidental orders.
X. (the mother) against De directie Preventie, en namens Y. (the father) (14 april 2000, ELRO nr. AA 5524, Zaaksnr.R99/076HR)
Challenge to legality dismissed; the standard of harm required under Article 13(1)(b) had not been met and the return was therefore ordered.