TGI Nice, 29 juin 2000, No 421/00
Risque grave – art. 13(1)(b) – Int?gration de l’enfant – art. 12(2) – Droits de l’homme – art. 20 – Questions proc?durales Le juge ordonna l’ex?cution provisoire de la d?cision et fit interdiction ? la m?re de sortir du territoire avec l’enfant si ce n’est dans le cadre de l’ex?cution de son retour imm?diat au […]
CA Grenoble, 29 mars 2000, No de RG 00/00797
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) There was no immediate grave risk that the return of the child would expose her to a physical or psychological danger or place her in an intolerable situation. In this the court noted that the child had had her principal residence with her father in the United States since September […]
CA Lyon, 15 mars 2000, No de RG 53/2000
Les quatre enfants en cause, dont le plus jeune ?tait ?g? d’un an au moment du d?placement, avaient ?t? unilat?ralement emmen?s des Etats-Unis en France par la m?re. Le 8 f?vrier 2000, le tribunal de grande instance de Lyon avait ordonn? le retour imm?diat des enfants aux Etats-Unis o? ils devaient ?tre remis ? leur […]
TGI Montpellier, 1 f?vrier 2000, No 00310/00
L’enfant, une fille, ?tait ?g?e de 19 mois ? la date du d?placement dont le caract?re illicite ?tait all?gu?. Elle avait jusqu’alors toujours v?cu en Grande-Bretagne avec ses parents. A la suite d’une m?sentente entre les ?poux, le p?re obtint du tribunal de Stockport une ordonnance interdisant ? la m?re de sortir l’enfant du territoire […]
Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, (2001) 31 E.H.R.R. 7
The case related to two girls, born in 1981 and 1984, to a French mother and Romanian father. On 20 December 1989 the parents divorced in France. The Tribunal de Grande Instance at Bar-le-Duc recognised a consent order entered into by the parents whereby the father was accorded parental responsibility and the mother was awarded […]
CA Paris, 7 octobre 1999, No de RG 1999-18635
R?le des Autorit?s centrales – art. 6 – 10 –
TGI Guingamp, 2 septembre 1999, No de RG 99/00777
L’enfant, un gar?on, ?tait ?g? de 13 ans ? la date du non-retour dont le caract?re illicite ?tait all?gu?. Les parents avaient divorc?; l’enfant r?sidait chez son p?re en Angleterre, la m?re ayant un droit de visite. A l’issue d’une p?riode de visite et d’h?bergement en France chez sa m?re, l’enfant ne rentra pas en […]
CE 30/06/1999 M Guichard
The child who was aged approximately 1 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal was born in France to a Canadian mother. On 13 May 1992 the mother relocated to Montr?al (Canada) with the child. In letters dated 5 March and 21 April 1993 the father sought the assistance of the French Central […]
Cass Civ 1?re 13 mai 1999, N? de pourvoi 97-13.000
Two children were born of the marriage of the spouses S and R. The family lived in the United States. The mother unilaterally removed the children to France. This removal was in breach of American court orders made at the time of the parents’ divorce which gave parental authority to both the mother and father […]
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 2 BvR 1206/98, 29 October 1998
The children, a boy and a girl, were 6 2/3 and 3 respectively at the date of the first alleged wrongful removal. They had until then lived in Germany all of their lives. The parents were separated and had joint rights of custody. On 17 February 1997 in a custody hearing in Germany the mother […]